RE: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03

Roy, latest draft looks great, except for the following issues (all
minor):

Under no reasonable definition of the phrase "in common use" could the
gopher URI fit.  It should be removed.

In Appendix D, please consider putting the names of rules in <brackets>,
as recommended in RFC 2234, Section 2.1.

There's not enough information to dereference [Siedzik]. The symbolic
name [UTF-8} should be changed to [RFC2279] for consistency.  Also,
please change <?rfc sortrefs="no"?> to yes to make it easier to review
the references.

          - dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@dankohn.com>
<http://www.dankohn.com/>  <tel:+1-650-327-2600>

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 19:08
To: uri@w3.org


I have just submitted draft 03, which can also be obtained via
the issues list at

    http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/issues.html

Please note that all issues have been fixed or closed.  If you'd
like to raise a new issue or reopen an old one, please do so
within the next two weeks.


Cheers,

Roy T. Fielding, Chief Scientist, Day Software
                  2 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150
                  Newport Beach, CA 92660-7929   fax:+1.949.644.5064
                  (roy.fielding@day.com) <http://www.day.com/>

                  Co-founder, The Apache Software Foundation
                  (fielding@apache.org)  <http://www.apache.org/>

Received on Saturday, 7 June 2003 10:01:26 UTC