- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:38:57 -0400
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Tim Bray scripsit: > Section 3.1 and elsewhere. Draft refers to '#' as crosshatch and '@' as > 'commercial at sign'. I'm an old text geek and I don't really know > these names. Might it be a good idea, for maximum reach, to adopt (or > at least mention) the Unicode names? "Commercial at" is indeed the Unicode name of "@"; but I agree that it would be better to use the Unicode name "number sign" for "#". -- Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter, Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme): jcowan@reutershealth.com One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically http://www.reutershealth.com Challenges poets who / Don't have the time. --robison who's at texas dot net
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 08:39:05 UTC