W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Proposal: new top level domain '.urn' alleviates allneedforurn: URIs

From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:46:09 -0400
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Cc: michael@neonym.net, sandro@w3.org, hardie@qualcomm.com, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030716114609.GN10518@mercury.ccil.org>

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com scripsit:

> Errr... if 2396 does not talk about comparing resources, that that
> also means that you cannot presume that two lexically distinct
> URIs *definitely* denote different resources -- only that the two 
> URIs *might* denote different resources.
> I also see no reason why, given knowledge of the significance
> of 2396 to the Web and SW architectural layers, that these 
> points cannot be made clear, even without referring to those
> higher layers.


Only do what only you can do.           John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
  --Edsger W. Dijkstra,                 http://www.reutershealth.com
    deceased 6 August 2002              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 07:51:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC