- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:00:50 -0400
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, uri@w3.org
* Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org> [2003-04-29 16:12-0700] > > >Given the level of support for Hayes's proposal, I'd very > >much like Fielding to elaborate his position. > > What more is there to elaborate? A paragraph that merely punts on > the issue will engender such debates in every single working group > that uses URIs and (as happened prior to 2396) will result in > technologies that assume resource == file and other such garbage. > The status quo is to leave the definition as is, since we know that > doesn't break any real systems. Only because many of us have ignored the quasi-mystical stuff about Resource essence, and taken it as a synonym for 'thing'... Dan
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 20:08:40 UTC