- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:14:10 -0700
- To: <uri@w3.org>
For examples of the scheme's use, see: http://www.apple.com/ical/library/ (links with text "subscribe") ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>; <uri@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:00 AM Subject: Re: iCal > > OOps... > > http://www.apple.com/ical/ > > I believe it does support iCalendar, judging from its publication format. > > I know that Outlook/Exchange utilizes iCalendar, but AFAIK they use a > proprietary protocol to publish calendars and integrate with e-mail > (please correct me where I'm wrong), whereby iCal is using HTTP/WebDAV and > (unfortunately) URI schemes (instead of media types), respectively. As a > result, I don't think they'll interoperate in many cases (i.e., I can't > use iCal instead of Outlook to keep up with my corporate calendar > solution). > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com> > To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>; <uri@w3.org> > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:04 AM > Subject: RE: iCal > > > I didn't see the link? As far as I know, Apple supports iCalendar RFC > 2445, which is also supported in MS Outlook and undoubtedly many other > clients.. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.txt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:58 PM > > To: uri@w3.org > > > > > > Apple's iCal [1] allows you to publish calendars (using the iCal > format) > > to Web servers and later retrieve them, using WebDAV*. However, they > use a > > non-HTTP URI scheme to denote a calendar - 'webcal'. > > > > Is this new, and if so, can pressure be put upon the Apple W3C folks? > This > > is not a small abuse; I fear 'gif' and 'html' URI schemes will be > close > > behind if we're not careful. > > > > * They claim it requires WebDAV, but I was able to successfully > publish my > > calendar to a server that only supports PUT (as any REAL Web server > > should). I don't have data yet as to whether they excercise anything > else > > in DAV... > > > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham > >
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 11:16:45 UTC