- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:48:15 -0700
- To: "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
(I thought I had sent this out but apparently not.) > ... Imagine I publish a daily web journal, > at http://dailynews.example.org/. Intuitively, I think that > > urn:duri:20010429:http://dailynews.example.org/ > > should refer to the issue that was published some time on > 29-April. But according to your definition, it refers to a 28-April issue. Using the 'last instant' has its own set of problems -- it seems to require deciding, a priori, whether after minting urn:tdb:2002:...yourwebpage... you might need to change your mind about what's on your page and mint another one. The shorter version urn:tdb:2002 comes after the more explicit urn:tdb:200204. And anyone outside of your lucky time zone (you in the UK) will probably get the date wrong on your international journal anyway. Many journals seem to publish their April 29 issue late on April 28, in any case. I'm not sure there's a solution that works uniformly for the problem that Al's identified ("likely confusion over dates if follows common usage"). The counter-proposals have just as many failure cases.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2002 16:49:14 UTC