At 02:15 PM 9/24/2001 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: >Content-Types should be defined by URIs, as are XML Namespaces. These then >leverage the existing URI schemes to anchor thier meanings in the web. >This allows anyone to make a local private Content-Type or namespace for >their own use. This does NOT apply to URI schemes. The process has to be >rooted somewhere, and that root is the URI spec and the *small* set >of URI schemes. I'm confused by this statement. In your estimation, is the Eastlake proposal to solve this problem a Good Thing, a Bad Thing, or just a Thing. For your reference: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-cturi-02.txt I'm assuming you see this as a Bad Thing, at which point, I anxiously await an alternate proposal. Thanks RobReceived on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 05:10:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:39 UTC