- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:20:44 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
At 04:20 PM 9/24/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > >All refs to [RFC 2396] include the extension given by [RFC 2732] > > > > (a) I don't see what significance RFC 2732 has regarding this I18N > > debate. Or am I missing something? > >Isn't that the one that adds '[' and ']' to the allowed characters. Yes, to allow IPv6 addresses without escaping, IIRC. >IRI's, because of the idempotency, can include any URI. Some of these URIs >are the encoding of an IRI without any % escapes other than %25; some of >them such as ones with D%FCrst in them are not. Even ones which are the >UTF-8 encoding of some IRI might not have that as the intended unencoded >form, only the end server knows how to correctly decode a URI. Oh yes, I see what you mean. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 11:30:41 UTC