- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:18:13 -0800
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@akamai.com>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
>> I agree, but this seems very different from the mapping proposed by >> RFC 3023 [1] which defines a mapping from a (namespace) URI into a >> content type based on an IANA registration and a new "+xml" syntax >> convention for XML based content type names. > >Where does 3023 propose such a mapping? Through the central registration process. This is for example how the "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" namespace identifier identifying the SVG language is proposed to be mapped into "image/svg+xml". This is of course not an automatic mapping but a mapping nonetheless. Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 02:20:15 UTC