- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:31:09 +0200
- To: julian.reschke@gmx.de, ejw@cse.ucsc.edu, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, uri@w3.org
> > As a result, I recommend that the XML namespace > recommendation be modified > > to allow the use of just the URI scheme name as a namespace > identifier, The interpretation of a URI scheme prefix as a valid URI also makes sense from the viewpoint of RDF (at least to me ;-) in that otherwise, one has no way to make statements about the URI scheme itself. The same is true for a URN Namespace. Thus, "DAV:", "http:", "urn:", and "urn:issn:" should all be considered valid URIs. Not necessarily valid in terms of the individual schemes themselves, but in terms of the semantics assigned to those prefixes by RFC2396 and RFC2141. I.e. "http:" is not a valid HTTP URL but it is a valid URI denoting the HTTP URL scheme. > I doubt that anybody is going to touch XMLNS, No need to touch XMLNS. If the above are URIs, then you can use them as namespace URI refs. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 07:31:17 UTC