- From: Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 02:16:40 -0800
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@eBuilt.com>, <uri@w3.org>
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > The scheme name is completely irrelevant to a URI's capacity for > identification -- it merely indicates the syntax for that namespace Do you claim, then, that a scheme cannot put constraints on the kind of resources identified by its URIs? I think you've asserted that the http scheme *doesn't* do this (which Patrick is disputing), but I'm curious whether you believe this to be an ironclad rule that must apply to all schemes. -- P. -- Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com> http://www.ideanest.com/ "It's the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance."
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 05:21:01 UTC