- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:50:36 -0500
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, <uri@w3.org>, <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>, Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Michael Mealling <michaelm@netsol.com>, Ted Hardie <hardie@equinix.com>
Hi, From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com> User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:32:29 -0600 To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, <uri@w3.org>, <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> CC: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Michael Mealling <michaelm@netsol.com>, Ted Hardie <hardie@equinix.com> Message-ID: <B68CBD0C.20830%aswartz@swartzfam.com> In-Reply-To: <NDBBKEBDLFENBJCGFOIJMEDFEEAA.masinter@adobe.com> >Larry Masinter <masinter@Adobe.COM> wrote: > >> However, for the case of content-types (which was the original >> motivator), Don Eastlake wrote a draft >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-cturi-01.txt. > >Interesting draft, but I have a few questions: > >What's wrong with the current system of URI mapping: > > http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/ IANA is more or less in the process of moving from isi.edu to iana.org, an illustration of the instability of domain names. >especially: > > http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/ There is no guarantee of this structure remaining the same and I don't see why one would think you could design a structure that would encompass all current and future IANA supervised protocol parameter values. Using a domain name in a fundamental protocol parameter encoding is basicly a bad idea except in some cases where the domain name is in a part of the DNS name space specifically set aside for that purpose. Basicly unless it is under .arpa (or a few .*.int second level domains that were allocated before it was decided to put future parameter domains under .arpa). >Also, what's the point of making URIs into content types? Where would this >be used? To express the types of objects that have only a URI type label originally defined in MIME contexts such as SMTP where only Content-Type is permitted. >Thanks for clearing things up, > >-- >[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ] Thanks, Donald =================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Streeet lde008@dma.isg.mot.com Milford, MA 01757 USA +1 508-634-2066(h) +1 508-261-5434(w)
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 00:50:35 UTC