- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:38:08 -0400
- To: "Larry Masinter" <lmnet@attglobal.net>
- cc: "Tim Kindberg" <timothy@hpl.hp.com>, uri@w3.org
Larry Masinter wrote: > Could "dated URLs" meet the same requirements that were identified > for "tags"? > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/1998Jan/0009.html > http://lists.netsol.com/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0009&L=URN-IETF&P=R2811 Yes, I think they do meet our requirements as stated, but perhaps we left out one criterion from that list. Martin Duerst pointed me to your dated-url proposal, by the way. Tim Kindberg and I debated whether to specifically reference it in our draft, and decided against it, thinking it was more casual a proposal than one would normally reference and that it addressed a somewhat different problem. Instead we simply added a line about there being various previous proposals in this space. I apologize if that was insufficient; I'm still learning the practices in this field. I like the tag syntax a little more than dated-url, but my main problem with dated-url for my application is in the semantics of the URI. I interpret urn:dated-url:200008:http://larry.masinter.net/ as denoting a web page as it existed at some point in the past (even if there never was such a web page). (More technically, I would reference the HTTP RFC's definition of what http: URIs denote.) Your e-mail above suggests you mean the string it as a denotation-free identifier, but I think that's counter-intuitive. I also think the web-page-as-it-existed is a very useful concept in its own right. (Although such a URI scheme probably ought to provide for all the external variables that could effect the page, not just time. Complex issue.) Maybe I should say a little more about semantics: there's an open question in the semantic web community about whether http: URIs can only denote web pages or can be used to denotate arbitrary things in arbitrary domains of discourse. One of my goals for the tag: URI is to provide an alternative, so people who think http: URIs should only be used for web pages can still use URI syntax for arbitrary identification. -- sandro
Received on Monday, 30 April 2001 02:41:12 UTC