- From: Rogers, Paul <progers@vignette.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:47:06 -0600
- To: "'uri@w3.org'" <uri@w3.org>
I realize my questions probably border on the moronic, but I'm just trying to understand how browsers/user agents and servers are handling the following: * multibyte character domain names (are all hostnames currently ASCII/Latin1, or are there, say, chinese language domain names). I'm guessing the answer is "of course NOT, stupid, that's the reason for the IURI proposal," but I just want to double-check...8?) * hex-encoded characters in URLs. I just tried surfing to www.%79%61%68%6f%6f.com, and on IE5, it takes me to www.yahoo.com, but Netscape Navigator 4.6 can't find the server. Probably what I should do is just browse around the respective browser docs; I was just hoping folks on this list had been through this... --- Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com] > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 9:21 AM > To: Rogers, Paul > Cc: uri@w3.org; duerst@w3.org > Subject: RE: IURI questions > > > You asked me and the rest of the list, but the truth is that I don't > have a good idea about the actual deployment of IURI; I think > it's an idea > that needs validation. If it works for you (and others) > that's good evidence > that we might move it forward as a Proposed Standard. > > So the answer to "how hard should I work?" I think that you should > try to get some normalization code that works for you. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rogers, Paul [mailto:progers@vignette.com] > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 7:38 AM > > To: 'Larry Masinter' > > Cc: uri@w3.org; 'duerst@w3.org' > > Subject: RE: IURI questions > > > > > > While we await the results of that review, I have the following > > questions (apologies in advance if these are overly naive): > > > > * What do folks do now in terms of generating/processing an > IURI-like > > string? > > > > * Related to above, is there a de facto standard right now > > > > * (the real point of my queries) To what extent is the Unicode > > normalization occurring. > > > > I'm trying to determine how hard to work to obtain > normalization code in > > order to satisfy step 2 of section 2.2 of the IURI draft...? > > > > Thanks for any/all responses.
Received on Tuesday, 29 February 2000 10:47:56 UTC