Re: [URN] Re: URI documents

[reposted, since it bounced last week]

Foteos remarked:
>	I do think, however, that the current draft needs to clarify
>whether more than one unescaped hash ('#') can be present.

I don't understand why.  The current draft only allows a single
unescaped hash to ever occur in a URI-reference --- it is not allowed
in any other component.  That is completely unambiguous, so you can
parse it from any direction you like.  Note that the algorithm
presented in the appendix is left-to-right.

....Roy

Received on Friday, 23 January 1998 00:58:46 UTC