Re: http charset labelling

Masataka Ohta writes:

> > I guess you, I, and a lot of other people, think that if people really
> > want to be global, they should avoid using kanji, or whatever, in
> > URL's. However, as a persoan at Astec said, and I agree, people *will*
> > put kanji into resource names, and they *will* expect it to work. As
> > such, I think it better to design a system that can handle *all*
> > cases, as users expect them to be handled.
> 
> Just make viewers bounce any URL with the 8th bit set or, at least,
> mask the bit. '%' notation should still be accepted.
> 
> It is also a good idea to do the same thing at the protocol
> specification level that:
> 
> 	8th bit of URL MUST be 0. Should a malformed URL is found,
> 	its 8th bit MAY be masked to be 0. Otherwise the URL MUST
> 	be rejected.
> 
> Then, non-ASCII URLs will disappear.

Well, URLs do not have a charset per se, they are abstract.
So possibly the URLs with % in them are more than ascii actually.
In fact they could be anything, and everything, like a UTF-8 URL. 

I do not care about how the URLs are looking on the HTTP level,
they may have as many % in them as needed, as long as the
URLs we write on business cards, in magazines aetc can be
natural, that is in evrey language and script of the world.

Keld

Received on Monday, 12 February 1996 15:45:25 UTC