From: "Ronald E. Daniel" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <9510041552.ZM971@whatthe.acl.lanl.gov> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 15:52:11 -0600 In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter <email@example.com> To: Larry Masinter <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com Subject: Re: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF? On Oct 4, 1:43pm, Larry Masinter wrote: > Subject: no child-of-URI groups at Dallas IETF? > Discussion of charters & WG milestones seem to have died down, and no > one has requested any WG or BOF slots.... > > If maybe things are happening offline and you don't need to meet? Sorry that I have not kept everyone informed on this. I have submitted the URC-WG charter to John and Harald and am waiting to hear from them on the status of the URC-WG. I have continued to work on URCs, and have some stuff that I am about ready to send to the URC list. People who want to see the rough notes can take a look at http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URC/canonical.html If the URC-WG charter is accepted, I would hope that we would meet in Dallas to talk about the canonical representation and how it does or doesn't meet the needs of the various protocols. Regards, -- Ron Daniel Jr. email: firstname.lastname@example.org Advanced Computing Lab voice: (505) 665-0597 MS B-287 TA-3 Bldg. 2011 fax: (505) 665-4939 Los Alamos National Lab http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel/ Los Alamos, NM, 87545 tautology: "Conformity is very popular"