Re: Proposition on advanced URL features (Is # illegal)?

R. Fielding wrote:
> 
> > 1.  The use of ## for special anchors seems reasonable.
> 
> Use of more than one "#" character is illegal and not desirable
> in the current URI syntax.

It's an interresting point here.  Let's see this quote from RFC 1808
(by R. Fielding):

|2.4.1.  Parsing the Fragment Identifier
| 
|   If the parse string contains a crosshatch "#" character, then the
|   substring after the first (left-most) crosshatch "#" and up to the
|   end of the parse string is the <fragment> identifier.  If the
|   crosshatch is the last character, or no crosshatch is present, then  
|   the fragment identifier is empty.  The matched substring, including  
|   the crosshatch character, is removed from the parse string before
|   continuing.
| 
|   Note that the fragment identifier is not considered part of the URL.
|   However, since it is often attached to the URL, parsers must be able
|   to recognize and set aside fragment identifiers as part of the 
|   process.
| 

It states clearly 'the first (left-most) crosshatch "#" and up to the
end of the parse string is the <fragment> identifier'.  This _does_ imply
that there are more '#' characters than one ... Why say ``leftmost "#"
character'' if there is only one allowed ? -- Mirsad

>  ...Roy T. Fielding
>     Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
>     University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
>     http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/
> 
> 


-- 
Mirsad Todorovac at Electrical Engineering Faculty, University Zagreb, Croatia
mirsad.todorovac@etf.hr, tm@rasip.etf.hr

Received on Wednesday, 29 November 1995 05:19:11 UTC