W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 1995

Re: Vetting rules for UR* schemes

From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 23:53:59 +0100
Message-Id: <199511262253.XAA08164@dale.uninett.no>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: uri@bunyip.com, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
Thanks - the relative-URL stuff should be in place by the time you
read this (unless you work Sunday nights....)

I don't know exactly how to phrase the difference between "interactive
URLs" and "noninteractive URLs" (consider chat Web pages!!!), but
I think your general concern is more or less in tune with the "what
operations does this object permit?" question.

I'll try to invent some creative language for encoding rules.
Extensibility - now THERE's a painful subject!
I'll let that one rest for a while, unless you can come up with a
language suggestion, and look at it again in a month or so.

Looking forward to seeing you in Dallas!

Received on Monday, 27 November 1995 02:39:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:32 UTC