- From: Paul Hoffman <ietf-lists@proper.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 14:33:28 -0700
- To: uri@bunyip.com
Greetings. Larry Masinter has pointed out that there is some confusion about our recent I-Ds and the status of our previous I-D, "draft-ietf-uri-yaurn-00". We got feedback from folks that they'd rather see the "draft-ietf-uri-yaurn-00" broken into smaller pieces to make commenting on it easier. Thus, we split "yaurn" into the four I-Ds we sent out earlier this week and had the "yaurn" I-D expired early. Before sending out the four I-Ds, we also made other changes to some of the specifics in each proposal. For perspective, the other URN I-Ds that were submitted before Danvers mostly talked specific URN resolution schemes. Few of the active I-Ds went into much detail about the overall structure of URN resolution, about resolution results, or about the syntax of URNs; we thought these were very important, so we made each of these a separate I-D. The active I-Ds written by other authors all do talk about specific URN resolution schemes, so we separated out our own proposal for a resolution scheme, x-dns-2, as its own I-D. --Paul Hoffman --Ron Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 1995 17:33:20 UTC