- From: Paul Hoffman <ietf-lists@proper.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 14:38:32 -0700
- To: John Curran <jcurran@nic.near.net>
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
>Some entity will "assign" xxx.path.urn to a company, giving them an implicit >endorsement of use of that set of URNs, and will do it without consideration >to the current DNS allocations. To quote Michael: > >>If you are asking if there is a relationship between the existing >>hostnames and the "path.urn" names - there is not. They are unrelated. >>It would probably be the case that some of the same machines that >>function as nameservers for hostnames would also function as servers >>for the "path.urn" namespace, but this isn't required. ... Ah, or should I say, arrrgh. Creating another naming authority seems like a Very Bad Thing for many reasons, not just the potential for trademark infringement. I misunderstood the I-D since it uses very DNS-looking examples and talks at the beginning about existing naming authorities. >What entity has the honor of registering publishers? Do we have a policy >document which provides this entity with guidance on how to perform these >registrations? In particular, if I apply on day 1 for path:/com/microsoft, >will the registration be accepted or not? These are relevant questions with respect to the legal issue of "trade dress," which encompasses what companies do to make themselves look a particular way outside of just trademarks. Trade dress that is highly likely to create confusion of ownership, even if it's not confusion with a trademark, can get you into all sorts of trouble, I believe. Setting up an "alternate" domain name system (where the domain is URNs instead of machines) could certainly be considered confusing. >That's not to say we shouldn't establish a new namespace for this purpose, >only that we may have to watch the outcome of the current suits underway to >determine the safest course of action. I'm not aware of any current lawsuits. All the public complaints have been resolved out of court, I believe. This doesn't mean we're safe; there are still hundreds of thousands of hungry lawyers out there, and many of them are just clueless enough about the Internet to smell money in domain names. --Paul Hoffman --Proper Publishing
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 1995 17:36:52 UTC