Re: The Path URN Specification

Martin Hamilton (
Sat, 18 Mar 1995 15:47:32 +0000

Message-Id: <>
To: (Daniel LaLiberte)
Subject: Re: The Path URN Specification 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Mar 1995 16:58:25 CST."
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 1995 15:47:32 +0000
From: Martin Hamilton <>

Daniel LaLiberte writes:

| Below is the draft of our path scheme specification.  This same
| version (modulo format, name, and date) will be submitted as an
| internet draft.

Very thought provoking - thanks!

It seems a bit too complicated.  I wonder whether the sub-node stuff is really necessary - could the resolver not just recurse down to the most deeply nested DNS server ?  e.g. consider a path URN of


In my version, the resolver would look up

  (1) NS records for publishers.path.urn.
  (2) NS records for uk.publishers.path.urn.
  (3) NS records for

Say the first two lookups are OK, but the third one fails as Hamish Hamilton don't run their own nameserver.  Now the resolver falls back to the last nameserver it spotted - the one for /publishers/uk - and looks up

  (4) A record for

How does that sound ?