- From: Karen R. Sollins <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 12:36:16 -0400
- To: FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
Mark, Let me add to your list of reasons that it is a bad idea for a resolver name (or resolution service name) to be embedded in a URN. There may well be (hopefully will be) more than one resolution service available at any given time. At any particular time (T) different clients may prefer different such services for a variety of reasons (correctness vs. cost, for example). How can the name generator possibly know the single "right" answer the resolution service to use for all time, when at any given time more than one may be the right answers for different clients? Karen
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 1995 12:36:52 UTC