- From: Ken Meyering <immedia@netwest.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 18:08:03 -0700
- To: bede@scotty.mitre.org, www-talk@www10.w3.org
- Cc: peterd@bunyip.com, marc@matahari.ckm.ucsf.edu, michael@junction.net, rating@junction.net, uri@bunyip.com
At 08:05 PM 6/26/95 -0400, bede@scotty.mitre.org wrote: >In this scheme, the HTTP client might receive a header like this: > > Content-Rating: MPAA "PG13+AC+AL" > >The client might also *send* a header like this as part of a >negotiation, as is now the case with "Accept:" headers. In the case >of a server, though, the server is claiming that the "MPAA" rated the >attached document "PG13+AC+AL". The client is free to verify this >claim, possibly by using a "content-rating" protocol. How would this scheme handle the following URL? (Pardon my honesty.) http://www.penthousemag.com/magazine/p06jun/06pet06.jpg Ken Meyering immedia@netwest.com http://www.netwest.com/~immedia
Received on Monday, 26 June 1995 21:05:42 UTC