- From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 20:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@utopia.com>
- Cc: R Martin Roscheisen <rmr@cs.stanford.edu>, uri@bunyip.com
On Fri, 23 Jun 1995, Kee Hinckley wrote: > I have a question about SOAPs. > > The problem is what to do with unrated sites. [summary: saying "allow unrated sites" would allow unrated obscure 'naughty' sites to still go through, and "disallow unrated sites" would most likely prevent valid places.] The latter would probably be the only acceptible choice for those protecting their young'ins. The problem then becomes a lack of data points - a demand - which could be solved by market forces. Ideally the lack of data points could be mitigated by the community working together - i.e., the parents can review content on their own (late at night, after the kids have gone to bed) and submit SOAPs which could be combined and weighed, either under the umbrella of the larger SOAP accumulator or on their own. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Sunday, 25 June 1995 23:31:37 UTC