Message-Id: <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 14:03:34 -0400 To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Stephen D. Williams) From: email@example.com (Kee Hinckley) Subject: Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps ) Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, At 1:54 PM 6/20/95, Stephen D. Williams wrote: >> >> At 3:41 PM 6/19/95, lilley wrote: >> >Those influential (and monied) groups who care about such things can the= n >> >finance the proxies and their URC resolvers to implement whatever type >> >of cens^H^H^H^Hfiltering is desired. >> >> A proxy based system really doesn't scale, money or no-money. > >I think you're wrong: All ISP's, companies, and Internet sites with more >than a few users should have proxies for http, ftp, nntp (Newsservers >are the most common proxy of course). Of course single global proxies >don't work, but neither would a small set of central news servers. Single global proxies are what was mentioned as an alternative. Your quick summary sound intriguiing, but too terse to evaluate. Kee Hinckley Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects=81 617/721-6100 email@example.com http://www.utopia.com/ I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.