Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )
Kee Hinckley (nazgul@utopia.com)
Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0400
Message-Id: <v02120d12ac0ca54ccfa4@[204.57.39.3]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0400
To: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
From: nazgul@utopia.com (Kee Hinckley)
Subject: Re: Criticism of Kidcode (was Re: KidCode: Next steps )
Cc: m.koster@nexor.co.uk (Martijn Koster), nsb@nsb.fv.com, rating@junction.net,
At 3:41 PM 6/19/95, lilley wrote:
>Those influential (and monied) groups who care about such things can then
>finance the proxies and their URC resolvers to implement whatever type
>of cens^H^H^H^Hfiltering is desired.
A proxy based system really doesn't scale, money or no-money.
Kee Hinckley Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects=81 617/721-6100
nazgul@utopia.com http://www.utopia.com/
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.