From: "Ron Daniel Jr." <email@example.com> Message-Id: <9506020914.ZM8197@macrdan.acl.lanl.gov> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 1995 09:13:58 -0600 In-Reply-To: Larry Masinter <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Larry Masinter <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Stockholm meeting Tuesday morning (one session) Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Thus spoke Larry Masinter: (at least on May 31 at 11:01pm) > Personally, I think that we do have a primary problem: 'not enough > focused work getting done on the mailing list', and only secondarily > 'too many things on the plate at once'. > > That is, there is little or no traffic on issues around URNs and URCs > on the mailing list; secondarily, we're opening up new issues (URAs). > > I've been trying to encourage those who are working on various > proposals to discuss their work more openly on the mailing list. It > isn't reasonable to wait until the week before the meeting, release a > document, and then expect rational discussion at the meeting. As one of the guilty parties, let me announce my schedule for sending URN and URC info to the list. Next week I will send a draft specification for the URC service. I hope it generates a lot of discussion. After that, I will start revising chunks of the URC scenarios draft and sending the new stuff to the list as it is generated. After that, I hope that the scenarios draft can move on to RFC status, and that was Michael Mealling's intention the last time I checked. I haven't formulated a plan for URN work at this time, having been concentrating on URCs lately. -- Ron Daniel Jr. email: email@example.com Advanced Computing Lab voice: (505) 665 0597 MS B287 fax: (505) 665 4939 Los Alamos National Laboratory http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rdaniel/ Los Alamos, NM 87545 tautology:"Conformity is very popular"