Re: no 'object architecture' in URI working group

Rich Salz (rsalz@osf.org)
Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:35:57 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: URI Revised charter"
Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "no 'object architecture' in URI working group"

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:35:57 -0400
Message-Id: <9507121435.AA06649@sulphur.osf.org>
To: masinter@parc.xerox.com, owner-uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: no 'object architecture' in URI working group
Cc: uri@bunyip.com

>The IETF _should_not_ standardise on an object system architecture.
>It should develop architectural frameworks within which future object
>system architectures can exist and be exploited.

The IETF should stay with protocols, working to ensure interoperability.

This has been the formula for its unparalleled success (viz ISO).
	/r$

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Leslie Daigle: "Re: URI Revised charter"
Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: URI Revised charter proposal"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "no 'object architecture' in URI working group"