To: email@example.com Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com In-Reply-To: Keith Moore's message of Mon, 10 Jul 1995 13:22:15 -0700 <199507102022.QAA00501@wilma.cs.utk.edu> Subject: Re: On 'Internet Drafts' From: Larry Masinter <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <95Jul10.email@example.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 13:43:49 PDT > As for whether something should be ietf-uri-* or author-*, I haven't > seen any published guidelines. > I named the issues draft 'draft-ietf-uri-*' instead of 'draft-moore-*' > because it was intended specifically to aid in this group's discussion. > I named the "URNs considered harmful" draft using 'draft-ietf-uri-*' > for the same reason. (though it didn't make it in before the deadline) You may be right. I was just responding to the appearance of disorder in 'draft-ietf-uri-*' and the likely prospect of more coming; I suppose really I'll just leave it as a request for (continued) moderation.