Re: Replication of UR* resources and Privacy

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
• Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: Replication of UR* resources and Privacy"
• Maybe in reply to: weibel@oclc.org: "Replication of UR* resources and Privacy"

From: weibel@oclc.org
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 09:20:11 -0400
Message-Id: <199507071320.JAA01633@ws02-00.rsch.oclc.org>
To: uri@bunyip.com
Subject: Re: Replication of UR* resources and Privacy

> I wrote:
> > > Let me answer this with a question.  Can you think of an example of a
> > > service that should _in_principle_, *not* be replicable?

> Note the in principle bit.  I think this was missed in the heat of the
> response.

> Stu wrote:

  [ a bunch of irrelevant stuff *blush*]

Sorry to have cluttered the list with my response to a question that
wasn't really asked.

stu

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Chris Weider: "Re: Follow up on charter proposal"
• Previous message: Mark Madsen: "Re: Replication of UR* resources and Privacy"
• Maybe in reply to: weibel@oclc.org: "Replication of UR* resources and Privacy"