- From: Keith Ball <kball@kballuw.SJF.Novell.COM>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 14:24:04 pst
- To: terry@ora.com
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
I think a URN could solve this problem. A new URL could be created for each transport/name service combination, or as Larry suggested before a new URL that allows multiple names in the URL. Then the URC for the URN contains all the different URLs to access the documents. Unfortunately, existing clients cant handle URNs and a URN system doesnt exist yet. The proposal is constrained enough that it will work with existing clients and gateways. (Is constrained the right word?) However, a URL describes a single location for a document. This URL also describes a single location for the document, it just gives alternate representations of the server name. What if the server can be accessed via multiple transports or known via multiple names in different naming systems. Here you have multiple avenues to the same host and the exact same document. What I dont want to see is a document reference (anchor) saying: "click here if you can access this document from NetWare" OR "click here if you can access this document via the Internet" making the person make a choice of access methods, when they are basically the same, HTTP (one over IP and the other over IPX). Let the client chose, it knows how it is configured and what is available. Keith > From Terry Allen <terry@ora.com> on Tue, 31 Jan 1995 > > I'll read this over again, but at first blush it seems like > a URN rather than a URL. Would you indicate how this would > differ from a URN? (Not challenging you, just inquiring.) ----------------------------------------- Keith Ball Unix/SMTP mail: kball@novell.com Building 1 MHS mail: KBALL@NOVELL 2180 Fortune Drive San Jose Fortune (sjf.novell.com) (408) 577 8428 Fax: (408) 577 5855 Novell, Inc. -- sent via the LAN WorkPlace Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 1995 17:24:50 UTC