Paul Hoffman <ietf-lists@proper.com> wrote: >Headers are given in RFC822 format, and it is likely (and probably >preferable) that only a "Subject:" header be included. Headers are given >without spaces after them, such as "Subject:current-issue". Two things: - I might be overlooking it, but I think this draft is still lacking a more explicit note about the missing space after a field-name. I.e. something saying that "if you want a space you *have* to encode it like 'Subject:%20current-issue'", or maybe an explicit url with the corresponding mail message generated from it. I know that it should not need to be mentioned, but I fear that people will be sloppy in their interpretation of the rfc and subsequently create differing implementations. - RFC822 (and probably others) are referring to fields and fieldnames, you seem to be talking about "headers". This might be a bit confusing. There usually is only one header, and this header contains several fields. I suggest you change the wording accordingly. -- Sincerely, berg@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless). "Well, if we're going to make a party of it, let's nibble Nobby's nuts!"Received on Wednesday, 25 January 1995 14:29:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:29 UTC