Re: Library Standards and URIs

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:11:57 PST


To: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov
Cc: winograd@cs.stanford.edu, uri@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov's message of Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:01:34 -0800 <95Jan5.110146pst.2764@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: Library Standards and URIs
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <95Jan5.111206pst.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 11:11:57 PST

> Anyone out there want to kick the strawman or spring to its defense?

I like it. I'm thinking that you might not actually _need_ to
construct the DTD, but that it is important that you _could_. It's
also important that you be able to parse the URC simply without using
a full SGML interpreter. (I think there were similar design
requirements for HTML.)