Re: Revised Internet Draft: draft-ietf-uri-url-mailserver-01.txt

In message <v02110104ab5eafb4ab1b@[]>, Paul Hoffman writes:
>mailserverurl    = "mailserver:" encoded822addr "/" subject "/" body

Why not use the existing name for this piece of functionality:


as per MIME (rfc1521)?

I suggest that whenever possible, the name space of URI schemes and
MIME external body access types should conicide.

Perhaps URIs will supercede MIME external-body references.

But why make up a new name for functionality that already exists?


Received on Wednesday, 8 February 1995 14:59:37 UTC