Re: URN namespace

Reed Wade (wade@cs.utk.edu)
Thu, 17 Aug 1995 14:14:10 -0400


Message-Id: <199508171814.OAA00694@cuspidor.cs.utk.edu>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: uri@bunyip.com, wade@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: URN namespace 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Aug 1995 10:55:21 PDT."
             <95Aug17.105533pdt.2763@golden.parc.xerox.com> 
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 14:14:10 -0400
From: Reed Wade <wade@cs.utk.edu>


>Quick, somebody grab 'urn.int'. I don't think you need a _new_ top
>level domain, do you?

There was actually talk about doing just this some time ago.

My memory was that somebody or other had said that this
would be fine once we'd gotten out of our experimental phase.

'we' meaning the entire urn gang

Keith can probably say exactly what this was about or
even if I remember that correctly.

-reed

-----
University of Tennessee, Knoxville            Dept of Computer Science
Netlib Development Group         'Dust--is round off error.' says geek
wade@cs.utk.edu -- <URL:http://www.netlib.org/utk/people/ReedWade.html>