To: firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org In-Reply-To: email@example.com's message of Fri, 16 Dec 1994 14:47:11 -0800 <9412162233.AA13092@godot.pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: proxies and FTP From: Larry Masinter <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <94Dec18.email@example.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 1994 00:55:22 PST Dealing with FTP servers that allow direct retrieval of full path names but not the 'cwd' method was an issue. In the end, we came up with a description in the standard that didn't match current practice, but was at least unambiguous (you could really tell what a ftp URL meant) and portable (you wouldn't have to know what operating system, brand of unix, etc. the remote FTP server was running). I imagine currently released clients and servers haven't tracked the proposed standard; I hope they do. In the meanwhile, the short answer is that you can't reliably give out ftp URLs for sites/files where cwd A; cwd B; retr C isn't equivalent to retr A/B/C.