- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:04:50 +0900
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
On 2023-05-31 09:03, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote: > On the other hand, ISO/IEC standards appear to get by just fine without > uppercasing the verbs relevant to conformance -- partly because they do > go to great lengths to ensure that the relevant verbs are not used in > non-standard senses. Part of this may be due to the fact that ISO uses "shall" in place of MUST. "shall" doesn't otherwise easily appear in prose. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2023 07:04:59 UTC