- From: Marcos Caceres <caceres_m@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:04:39 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
> On 27 Apr 2023, at 19:51, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > I suspect most spec editors don't need or want to follow the weekly list of commits to Bikeshed/Respec. They need the occasional notification of major changes--which Tab and Marcos make sure to manually post to this list. I set up the digest so I didn’t need to send the manual one 🙈🙊 > Therefore what the digests end up doing is lowering the signal:noise ratio of this list... which makes it less likely that spec editors will want to subscribe, and less likely that those who do will notice and pay attention to the other discussions on this list. And that lowers the ability of this list to be an effective communication forum for W3C spec editors. I’m biased, but I’m also a spec editor (and user of bikeshed and respec). I like to know what nee features are available and new. To be honest, I used to miss too much stuff with the manual announcements. > > If weekly digests are useful to some people, we should have an ML dedicated to them so those people can opt in. Is monthly ok though? At the same time, I want people to know what’s new. It serves its purpose.
Received on Friday, 28 April 2023 03:06:09 UTC