- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:00:57 +0000
- To: "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Yes, I confirm that yesterday's update to the spec-prod action (thanks, Sid!) fixes the issue. Auto-publication of GPU for the Web specs to TR have resumed. Francois. ------ Original message ------ From: "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org> To: spec-prod@w3.org Date: 11/03/2022 10:30:45 > hi Francois, Chris, > > Thank you for letting me know on how to fix, and also one for spec-prod. > I've noticed that PR merged: >https://github.com/w3c/spec-prod/pull/129 >and it should fix this point without any update in GHAction. > > Not like GPU for the web, updates at IWWG are not so frequent, so I may need some time >(days or a week) to confirm. > > ># sorry for late response, I was mostly off-the-keyboard yesterday, due that preparation for office moving > >On 2022/03/10 03:04, Francois Daoust wrote: >>Yes, the issue is indeed that "Prepare for TR: yes" is not set. >> >>WebXR and WebGPU specs are automatically published to TR through the spec-prod action. The problem is that the spec-prod action does not set "Prepare for TR: yes", whereas it should. That has gone unnoticed until now because the pubrules checker was more lax than it now is. >> >>I closed the issue I had created against Bikeshed (which works as intended), and created one against spec-prod instead: >>https://github.com/w3c/spec-prod/issues/128 >> >>Atsushi, in the meantime, you may add "Prepare for TR: yes" to WebXR specs, which should be enough to resume publication. I'm hoping that we can fix the spec-prod action pretty soon though, because I need the fix for Media WG and GPU for the Web WG specs as well ;) >> >>Francois. >> >>------ Original message ------ >>From: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> >>To: "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org>; spec-prod@w3.org >>Date: 09/03/2022 17:42:28 >> >>>Do you have >>> >>>Prepare for TR: yes >>> >>>in your bikeshed document, when you are preparing for publication? >>> >>>On 2022-03-09 01:28, Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) wrote: >>>> hi spec-prod colleagues, >>>> >>>> Not a main topic for here, but let me ask some help on bikeshed. >>>> >>>> I'm working as a team contact for Immersive-Web (WebXR), and we are suffering to error >>>>of /TR/ publication, with >>>>e.g. >>>>https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=bf194827-43d5-4429-a928-25717b4e7e34 >>>>https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=ec014e14-6ac6-4fa9-b2d6-c05bff69be2a >>>> >>>> also I've found several similar, like (gpuweb) >>>>https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=80dbafe9-108e-46e8-b2c6-1c45e9e65354 >>>> >>>># note, this seems to happen from 4th March globally to bikeshed specs?? >>>> >>>> >>>> These error (style.sheet last) is to check whether /TR/ stylesheet is at the last of >>>>stylesheets >>>>https://github.com/w3c/specberus/blob/main/lib/rules/style/sheet.js >>>>but last change to the file was at around one month ago. >>>>https://github.com/w3c/specberus/commit/e95ca8845f0b6978f28dcf8dd05c9a765c4d167a >>>> (so, timing is inconsistent) >>>> >>>> boilerplate for IWWG does not contain style definition, also generated html has one >>>>external stylesheet (/TR/ one) and several inline style blocks specified in .bs source. >>>>header for W3C has one placeholder of stylesheet: >>>>https://github.com/tabatkins/bikeshed-boilerplate/blob/main/boilerplate/header.include >>>> >>>> Do we need to ask some change in bikeshed processing, like what respec performed >>>>several years ago, or, do I miss some bikeshed configuration?? >>>>https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/2142/files >>>> >>>-- Chris Lilley >>>@svgeesus >>>Technical Director @ W3C >>>W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design >>>W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media >>> >>> >>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2022 10:01:00 UTC