- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:30:44 +1100
- To: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Philippe le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Hi Fuqiao, > On 9 Oct 2021, at 3:49 pm, Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org> wrote: > > IMHO we should expand the header by default, for the same reason as fantasai said in https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues/145 . I also agree with fantasai, but I think the "all or nothing" approach fantasai suggests is wrong... I think we should identify critical and non-critical items, and hide the non-critical items. We should also flatten some things to take up less space (or convert them to little menus), as proposed in 145. I don't image we will do that this year tho, but we should work towards that. > However, I also agree that "More details about this document" is a bit strange as a label and can be refined. yep. > In https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/blob/f9ca8610cd4828b9fd749befff6a9d9216bcabcf/p2021mockup/fixup.js#L10-L17 I see that the preference seems to be saved in the localStorage. Yes, that's the plan! > In addition, the new header style generated by ReSpec seems to make some documents in the i18n WG unable to work properly. See https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/392 for an example. I don't have time to look into where the problem is for now, though. Agree.. would be nice to fix those things as we have actual specs relying on that...
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2021 02:30:52 UTC