Re: How to find all spec editors in my company?

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:54 PM Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 6:48 PM Marcos Caceres <marcosc@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 30 Apr 2021, at 12:51 pm, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Do y'all know of any existing list of editors? If not, which tool do
>> you think is the right one to start from?
>>
>> I think the W3C API can give you what you need.
>>
>> In Plh's Gargantua project: https://github.com/w3c/gargantua
>>
>> If you open "browse.html" on localhost, you can see it loads up a
>> dropdown of each group… from there, it's possible to go view "users",
>> affiliations, and what specs they edit.
>>
>> That's coming from the W3C API - it pulls, for example, the users for
>> group 49309 (WebAppSec):
>>
>>
>> https://api.w3.org/groups/49309/users?apikey=oq0abw4w2bkwcs0k0kws44sok4cg48w&embed=1
>>
>> And then you can grab both the affiliation and their specs (search for
>> your name there, and you will see what I mean). It provides a list of end
>> points for the appropriate JSON.
>>
>> So, in theory, on can create a scrapper to go through each group (or a
>> set of groups), then for each user, check if they edit something, and then
>> check their affiliation… or some combination of that.
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>>
>>
> Thanks, that looks close, but it's missing at least 2 specifications:
> https://wicg.github.io/webpackage/loading.html should be under
> https://api.w3.org/users/a7a5jzj9hvs400sws4owc4sk8csk84w/specifications?apikey=oq0abw4w2bkwcs0k0kws44sok4cg48w&embed=1,
> and https://webbluetoothcg.github.io/web-bluetooth/ should be under
> https://api.w3.org/users/jt1cdbkgur4o8c0okkkw4kksosskwg4/specifications?apikey=oq0abw4w2bkwcs0k0kws44sok4cg48w&embed=1.
> Both of these are included in https://github.com/w3c/browser-specs.
>
> Do you know how the W3C API gets its list of specs and why it might be
> missing some?
>

https://github.com/w3c/w3c-api/issues/87 ("Expose Community Groups
reports") might indicate that CG reports aren't expected to be included yet.

Jeffrey

>