W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2017

Re: Editor's notes

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:35:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDoV9Yt0eN1L80U3V-7WUnaEwhEz9Lu-TTkWAOo6Vr+mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:
> This thread essentially started with an observation that there are three
> types of notes and two styles for them, with notes and ednotes essentially
> sharing similar style. The thread started with a proposal to combine two
> types of notes - first notes and ednotes, later ednotes and issues. Several
> people have said they use all three concepts and want to retain them, but
> nobody has opposed separating the two styles into three. So all that is
> needed is a different style for ednotes. I don't care much about the
> specifics, I'm not a designer, as long as it's easy to tell apart from the
> other two, and from other styling features. If orange is already taken,
> maybe yellow, or a dashed border, or whatever fits into the overall design
> and communicates the distinction for those who use it.

No, fantasai and I both oppose splitting the two stylings into three.
fantasai explicitly argued against styling ednotes and issues
differently.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 18:36:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:22 UTC