- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:29:09 -0500
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
When I went through this exercise, there got a lot of pressure from the
group not to have too many labels, so we eventually trimmed it down to 9.
https://github.com/sandhawke/spec-labels-min/labels?sort=name-asc
Since then, we've started using some horizontal review labels, as needed.
Philippe, I could probably dig out the arguments we found persuasive for
these over yours, where they differ, if you want. Mostly it was things
like like WG members not being clear what they meant.
The README for my repo above includes instructions for installing all
the labels. I suppose I should update the source-repo to include the
horizontals.
- Sandro
On 11/29/2016 05:53 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
>> I took an action item from the web platform wg to provide recommendations
>> for GitHub labels, with the goal of harmonizing them across repositories
>> overtime.
>>
>> Here is what I came up with:
>> https://w3c.github.io/spec-labels.html
>>
>> This page is referenced from
>> https://w3c.github.io/specs.html
>>
>> Comments, feedback are welcome.
> Looks reasonable overall.
>
> In CSS we also have a collection of labels used for DoC tracking, with
> colors matching the expectations of DoC formatting. You can see them
> at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/labels (they all, conveniently,
> start with the letter C, so they're grouped right at the top of the
> list).
>
> ~TJ
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 14:29:16 UTC