W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: ReSpec updated

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:20:44 +0100
Message-Id: <1457637644.965373.545598858.2E477626@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, at 20:13, Michael Cooper wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 2:06 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, at 19:53, Michael Cooper wrote:
> >> There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding
> >> "It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that
> >> pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is accepted
> >> by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but there may be
> >> others. The output of the new respec needs checking against pubrules
> >> before it can be considered fixed. Michael
> > I'm sure a pull request fixing this would be most welcome. :)
> When I'm in publication hell, exacerbated by a recently broken tool, 
> trying to learn the code in order to submit a pull request is just not 
> possible. I just don't have time to deal with that. 

Remember open-source contributors don't owe you anything and might be as
exacerbated by your expression of entitlement as you might be by their
broken tool. A tool which you are getting for free. :)

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:21 UTC