- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:23:52 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>
On June 8, 2016 at 5:11:57 AM, Markus Lanthaler (markus.lanthaler@gmx.net) wrote: > I'm not going to ask to start supporting IE11 again but what browser support do you aim > for? Only the absolute latest version? IE11 still seems to have a considerable market > share... Not amongst the tiny group of people who produce specs. Anyone publishing source documents without going through the spec generator is doing harm to their readers. It's really inexcusable given that we have had Echidna for over a year and we worked so hard to get the auto-publish process in place at the W3C. Even if you don't want to use Echidna, you can run `./tools/respec2html.js` locally when you check in your spec to have it generated for you. If people have any problems with generation, I'm happy to help them get set up! As one of ReSpec's maintainers, and for the benefit of those that rely on our specs, I would really like to see less ReSpec buttons (and FOUC!) and more specs on /TR/. Let's work towards making that super easy.
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 09:24:20 UTC