W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Re 2: What changed in respec re <a>-<dfn> pairing?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:50:23 +0100
Cc: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Message-Id: <2EBDA221-5331-4A71-AE80-2EC737CD89AA@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>

> On 22 Dec 2014, at 18:29 , Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:
> On 22/12/2014 18:07 , Tobie Langel wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org
>> <mailto:robin@w3.org>> wrote:
>>    Yes, that could very easily be the cause of the problem. In fact,
>>    I'm pretty sure it was: I just made a change that ought to fix that.
>> I was actually wondering why that changed had been made and thought
>> there was a valid reason to move it back.
>> Should have asked on the PR.
>> Mea culpa.
> I read through the same code and thought that it might make sense to have dfn processing happen earlier. So that's that.
> Inclusion is a brittle, rarely used, and undertested feature.

And damn useful! Not only it helped, in this case, share a glossary among two files, but it also helped me to edit an ugly table in a separate files; I hate editing huge files. So it is very useful!



> Unless we get a lot more tests for it it's likely not the last time we break it a bit...
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 17:50:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC