> On 22 Dec 2014, at 18:29 , Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > > On 22/12/2014 18:07 , Tobie Langel wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org >> <mailto:robin@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Yes, that could very easily be the cause of the problem. In fact, >> I'm pretty sure it was: I just made a change that ought to fix that. >> >> I was actually wondering why that changed had been made and thought >> there was a valid reason to move it back. >> >> Should have asked on the PR. >> >> Mea culpa. > > I read through the same code and thought that it might make sense to have dfn processing happen earlier. So that's that. > > Inclusion is a brittle, rarely used, and undertested feature. And damn useful! Not only it helped, in this case, share a glossary among two files, but it also helped me to edit an ugly table in a separate files; I hate editing huge files. So it is very useful! Thanks Ivan > Unless we get a lot more tests for it it's likely not the last time we break it a bit... > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 17:50:33 UTC