W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Re 2: What changed in respec re <a>-<dfn> pairing?

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:29:06 +0100
Message-ID: <549854E2.8080105@w3.org>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
On 22/12/2014 18:07 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org
> <mailto:robin@w3.org>> wrote:
>     Yes, that could very easily be the cause of the problem. In fact,
>     I'm pretty sure it was: I just made a change that ought to fix that.
> I was actually wondering why that changed had been made and thought
> there was a valid reason to move it back.
> Should have asked on the PR.
> Mea culpa.

I read through the same code and thought that it might make sense to 
have dfn processing happen earlier. So that's that.

Inclusion is a brittle, rarely used, and undertested feature. Unless we 
get a lot more tests for it it's likely not the last time we break it a 

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 17:29:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC