- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:40:45 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: chairs@w3.org, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
> Hi everyone, > We're looking into redesigning the W3C spec templates and style sheets > to reduce boilerplate content and improve usability and readability. > To help guide this project, we wanted to collect some information from > all the W3C WGs! Great, in WCAG we are also looking at doing some work along these lines as a part of an separate project. I'll discuss any potential overlap with our staff contact at the next editors meeting and we'll work out a way of dovetailing the two initiatives. Thanks Josh > So please forward this to your WGs; answers are welcome from WGs as a > whole and/or individual members, or some combination thereof, however > your group prefers to answer. Send them to spec-prod@w3.org [public]. > > 1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of > a W3C spec should "feel". > > 2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of > your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure > of the content). > > 3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions? > Please paste URLs: > > 4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use? > > 5. What are your goals for the redesign? > > 6. Is there anything else we should know / consider? > > > Note: This project is going to be a consensus-driven experiment, so > feedback will be welcome throughout. However, it is also a spare-time > project, so progress might be a bit slow and sporadic. :) > > More information at https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle > > Thanks~ > ~fantasai > >
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2014 18:41:23 UTC