- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:12:58 -0400
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
- Cc: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > So does jsdom[1]. Yet I've bumped into plenty of very annoying issues >> > with >> > it (even though jsdom actually has a JS runtime, which afaik html5lib >> > doesn't). >> >> Huh. I've never run into any problems, myself. > > Jsdom builds incorrect DOM trees for document that are missing a <head> > element (e.g. the Web Workers spec). Okay, then they are *not* implementing the HTML parsing algorithm. html5lib is. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 19:13:47 UTC